diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md b/content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md index 530842e..d8305f7 100644 --- a/content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md +++ b/content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md @@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ The compressed sizes were as follows, with percentage values to match: | RVZ (2MiB, Zstandard, level 10) | 98,800,396 | 41.32 | | RVZ (2MiB, Zstandard, level 22) | 93,857,212 | 39.25 | -As you can see, from this extremely limited test, the best performing archive format is LZMA using a 2MiB block size at compression level 9. It doesn't matter which container, our of RVZ and WIA you use. +As you can see, from this extremely limited test, the best performing archive format is LZMA using a 2MiB block size at compression level 9. It doesn't matter which container, out of RVZ and WIA you use. |