From 69201ee6e0651411a3c505edb97a406e4cf824ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:11:31 +0100
Subject: Typo

---
 content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md b/content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md
index 530842e..d8305f7 100644
--- a/content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md
+++ b/content/posts/gcz-rvz-wia-size-comparisons.md
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ The compressed sizes were as follows, with percentage values to match:
 | RVZ (2MiB, Zstandard, level 10) | 98,800,396 | 41.32 |
 | RVZ (2MiB, Zstandard, level 22) | 93,857,212 | 39.25 |
 
-As you can see, from this extremely limited test, the best performing archive format is LZMA using a 2MiB block size at compression level 9. It doesn't matter which container, our of RVZ and WIA you use.
+As you can see, from this extremely limited test, the best performing archive format is LZMA using a 2MiB block size at compression level 9. It doesn't matter which container, out of RVZ and WIA you use.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3